Accounting and Finance for Healthcare Managers – Studypool

I need help with a Accounting question. All explanations and answers will be used to help me learn.

The organization I chose to write about is a for – profit hospital. Any and all information collected should be in regards to the same organization. Please follow the guidelines below and include all of the proper information. I also attached the grading rubric. Please feel free to reach out with any questions or concerns. Thanks!

Option #1: Healthcare Delivery Organization Presentation

Develop a financial analysis of a healthcare delivery organization of your choosing. The intent of this assignment is to evaluate the financial and operational health of the organization and disseminate the information to the class. You may pursue, analyze, and synthesize any information source you choose (e.g., website content, personal interviews, organizational documentation). Strive to be rigorous and thorough in your research.

Note: For-profit organizations are generally easier to research than not-for-profits as all financials are reportable to the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Final Paper Instructions:

  • Projects are not limited in size, should be professional in appearance, and cover (at a minimum) the evaluation of the metrics discussed in Gapenski and Pink (2015), which are detailed in Chapter 13 in the sections about Ratio Analysis, DuPont Analysis, and Operating Indicator Analysis.
  • You may pursue, analyze, and synthesize any information source you choose (e.g., website content, personal interviews, organizational documentation). Strive to be rigorous and thorough in your research.
  • Your final presentation should report on the business’ location(s), competitive market(s), service lines, and business segments, for example. Unless otherwise indicated, a five-year trend analysis—including the most recent year of available information/data—is expected.
  • Do not just report the data—discuss what it means. Ultimately, would you invest in the company? Why or why not?
  • Presentations should adhere to Advisory Board formatting. See the Strategic Plan Template for an example.

HCM301 Module 8 Portfolio Project

HCM301 Module 8 Portfolio Project

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRequirements

40.0 to >32.0 pts

Meets Expectation

The Portfolio includes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

32.0 to >24.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

The Portfolio includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

24.0 to >16.0 pts

Below Expectation

The Portfolio includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

16.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

The Portfolio includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

40.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent

40.0 to >32.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Demonstrates strong or adequate knowledge of accounting and finance in healthcare management; correctly represents knowledge from the readings and sources.

32.0 to >24.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Some significant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge in accounting and finance in healthcare management.

24.0 to >16.0 pts

Below Expectation

Major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge in accounting and finance in healthcare management.

16.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials.

40.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Analysis

40.0 to >32.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Demonstrates strong or adequate critical analysis of accounting and finance in healthcare management.

32.0 to >24.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Some significant but not major errors or omissions in critical analysis of accounting and finance in healthcare management.

24.0 to >16.0 pts

Below Expectation

Major errors or omissions in critical analysis of accounting and finance in healthcare management.

16.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Fails to demonstrate critical analysis.

40.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSynthesis and Evaluation

40.0 to >32.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Demonstrates strong or adequate synthesis and evaluation of course concepts in accounting and finance in healthcare management.

32.0 to >24.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Some significant but not major errors or omissions in synthesis and evaluation of accounting and finance in healthcare management.

24.0 to >16.0 pts

Below Expectation

Major errors or omissions in synthesis and evaluation of accounting and finance in healthcare management.

16.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Fails to demonstrate synthesis and evaluation.

40.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePresentation

40.0 to >32.0 pts

Meets Expectation

The presentation was highly effective and appropriately addressed the target audience.

32.0 to >24.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Some significant but not major errors or omissions in selection, application or audience of the presentation.

24.0 to >16.0 pts

Below Expectation

Major errors or omissions in selection, application or audience of the presentation.

16.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

The presentation was totally ineffective and not targeted at the specified audience.

40.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSources

20.0 to >16.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Cite and report on the business location(s), the competitive market(s), service lines, business segments, etc. Unless otherwise indicated, a five year trend analysis – including the most recent year of available information/data.

16.0 to >12.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Cite and report on most of the following: the business location(s), the competitive market(s), service lines, business segments, etc. Unless otherwise indicated, a five year trend analysis – including the most recent year of available information/data.

12.0 to >8.0 pts

Below Expectation

Cite and report on at least three of the following: the business location(s), the competitive market(s), service lines, business segments, etc. Unless otherwise indicated, a five year trend analysis – including the most recent year of available information/data.

8.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Does not cite and report on the business location(s), the competitive market(s), service lines, business segments, etc. Unless otherwise indicated, a five year trend analysis – including the most recent year of available information/data.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeApplication of Source Material

20.0 to >16.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Sources well or adequately chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue; knowledge from the course linked properly to source material.

16.0 to >12.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Some significant but not major problems with selection and linkage of sources.

12.0 to >8.0 pts

Below Expectation

Major problems with selection and linkage of sources.

8.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Source selection is seriously flawed; no linkage to knowledge from the course.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization

20.0 to >16.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Project is clearly organized, well written, and in proper Advisory Board formatting including an introduction, body, and conclusion. Conforms to project requirements.

16.0 to >12.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Small number of significant but not major flaws in organization and writing; is in proper Advisory Board formatting. In a minor way does not conform to project requirements.

12.0 to >8.0 pts

Below Expectation

Major problems in organization and writing; does not completely follow proper Advisory Board formatting. In a significant way does not conform to project requirements.

8.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Project is not well organized or well written and is not in proper Advisory Board formatting. Does not conform to project requirements.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar and Style

20.0 to >16.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Strong sentence and paragraph structure; few or no minor errors in grammar and spelling; appropriate writing style; clear and concise with no unsupported comments.

16.0 to >12.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Small number of significant but not major errors in grammar and spelling; generally appropriate writing.

12.0 to >8.0 pts

Below Expectation

Inconsistent to inadequate sentence and paragraph development; work needed on grammar and spelling; does not meet program expectations.

8.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Poor quality; unacceptable in terms of grammar and/or spelling; inappropriate writing style that interferes with clarity.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates proper use of APA style

20.0 to >16.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Project contains proper APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with no more than one significant error.

16.0 to >12.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Few errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with no more than two to three significant errors.

12.0 to >8.0 pts

Below Expectation

Significant errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with four to five significant errors.

8.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Numerous errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with more than five significant errors.

20.0 pts

Total Points: 300.0

 

Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount. USE Discount “GET12” for 12%